Jump to content
RealModScene

robo989

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    3

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by robo989

  1. Posted

    I've tried it on a NAS with a mapped SMB share and also from my computer just to 100% eliminate that it's not a NAS read speed issue (both can serve up 90-100MB/s+. that's megaBYTES, so just under 1Gbit more or less)

     

    Basically, don't bother. It's completely useless because it's so slow. You will have load times approximately 3-4 time using a hard drive. Makes games literally unplayable.

     

    (I'm sure you will ignore this and try it anyway as I ignored the person who advised me to not bother)... :)

     

    Give it a go, it's satisfying to see it work, but that's it.

    • Like 1

  2. Posted

     

    Hi robo989
     
    The first time I finished set up sharing between the nas to xbox360 smb
    indeed .. Load times are approximately 4-5 times longer than normal.
    It certainly made ​​me mad. Until the moment I boot to nas.
    Then load has become more rapid, and took maximum  a double  time.
     I do not know to tell you for sure if it applies to all types of servers. As mentioned  the post refers to synology server.
    Slowness you mentioned continues to happen even after the reboot of the server? And what type of server do you have?
    Anyway usb connection is certainly more preferable then smb connection. But each of the following
    There are disadvantages and advantages. I personally prefer to work this way games are on the server.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    I tried it out on both a PC as a share (fast i7 2600K CPU) and a HP Microserver...both capable of saturating gigabit networks and Xbox 360 only has 100mbit...can only think that it's because I'm using GOD format for storage, how are your games stored mate?

     

    If it's only a 2x increase vs locally connected USB, I can handle that...4x-5x though not really.

    Thanks.

×
×
  • Create New...